All Regulation Isn’t Regulation: Why Food Hygiene in India Isn’t Getting Solved Anytime Soon

A few days ago, I had some foreign friends visiting India. First-timers, excited, curious. They had their checklist ready—Taj Mahal, Varanasi, street food. But along with the excitement, there was something else: fear. Not of crime, not of scams, not even of getting lost in the labyrinthine streets of Old Delhi. Their biggest concern? Food poisoning.

“Will we get sick?” they asked.

I didn’t know how to answer. I could have given them the standard advice—stick to bottled water, avoid raw salads, eat where there’s high turnover. But the truth is, even locals get hit. Every Indian I know has had at least one battle with a stomach bug, a mystery fever, or a suspicion of typhoid. It’s 2025, and this shouldn’t still be a concern. And yet, here we are.

More Rules, No Solutions

If you go by the books, food safety in India should be watertight. We have the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI), countless municipal regulations, and even state-specific rules. There are mandatory licenses, inspections, and even digital compliance systems. On paper, we should have the cleanest, safest food in the world.

But step outside, and reality slaps you in the face. Dhabas with water tanks full of algae, restaurants where the same oil has been frying pakoras since last Diwali, chaat stalls with staff that doesnt wash their hands, waiters that serve food while their finger is dipped in the curry. Street food is a gamble, restaurant kitchens are an unknown, and packaged food? Well, let’s not even get into the expired products getting a new sticker and gross violations of hygiene on the factory floor (literally floor because many factory owners refuse to invest in hygienic tables).

This isn’t about lack of regulation. It’s about how regulation actually functions in India. And food safety is just one example.

The Mafia Model of Enforcement

We’ve seen this before. Labour laws, pollution control, real estate norms—India is full of industries drowning in rules but starving for real enforcement. Here’s the typical pattern:

  1. Make more and more rules – Every time there’s a public outcry (a food poisoning scandal, a pollution spike), the response is predictable: “We need stricter regulations, shut down that store that we happened to raid once in 10 years, or pay a fine and carry on business as usual, .” So, new paperwork is introduced. More forms, more approvals, more “processes.”
  2. Ensure no one can fully comply – The rules are so complex, expensive, and unrealistic that following them 100% is almost impossible. A small restaurant that actually adheres to every hygiene standard will go out of business. A factory that genuinely follows pollution norms will not remain competitive.
  3. Turn enforcement into a business – Instead of improving conditions, the system turns into a rent-seeking operation. Inspectors don’t exist to enforce laws; they exist to extract money. If you don’t pay, suddenly, your compliance is “incomplete.” If you do, your violations disappear. It’s not about safety or pollution or workers’ rights—it’s about who pays whom.

And when the entire enforcement system runs like this, nothing actually changes. The cycle repeats: People get sick. A scandal happens. More rules are made. More bribes are paid. No one is actually safe.

We live in a world where lab-grown meat is a reality, where AI is optimizing everything from healthcare to logistics. And yet, an Indian in 2025 still has to worry about typhoid from bad water or food poisoning from street food.

It doesn’t fit. It’s not just embarrassing—it’s absurd. And overpopulation is no excuse, there are overpopulated countries with better Food Safety outcomes across the world.

Foreigners assume we don’t care about hygiene. But we do. The problem isn’t a lack of rules; it’s that the system isn’t designed to fix anything. It’s designed to extract money. That’s why we have five-star hotels with pristine kitchens and roadside eateries where the cooking station is inches from an open drain. The government officials enforcing these laws don’t care about safety—they care about their cut.

So, what’s the fix? It’s not more rules. We need something people can actually follow, without bribes and bureaucracy. Imagine if every restaurant had to display a hygiene score, updated monthly, right at the entrance. No complicated government apps—just a sticker, plain and simple.

Because in the end, if people demand better, businesses will be forced to clean up. Until then, we’ll keep playing food roulette, hoping today isn’t the day we lose.

The Accountability Chain & The Claim Chain

Blame, Credit, and Ambulances

Roads flood, cars stall, and we blame the driver. That’s The Accountability Chain—systemic flaws become personal failures, neatly shifting responsibility off the larger machine.

Meanwhile, Blinkit launches on-demand ambulances—five vehicles, each equipped with a paramedic and life-saving gear, arriving in 10 minutes. A fresh idea, a real benefit.

Then comes the official reminder: “Follow the law of the land.” Not just a regulation, but a quiet claim on any success. That’s The Claim Chain—when something works, the system steps in to ensure that credit (and revenue) funnel back its way.

We’ve seen this play out elsewhere:

  • Buy a Toyota Innova, and the taxes you pay can actually outstrip what the manufacturer pockets.
  • Fancy caramel popcorn? That’s taxed differently from the salted kind, because it’s not “namkeen.”

Yet, even as we fund endless categories and endure bizarre tax distinctions, the system wobbles. Patchy roads, precarious basements, and the daily churn of infrastructure failures remain. And each time it fails, we circle back to pointing fingers at individuals rather than the entities responsible for oversight, maintenance, and policy.

When the good stuff happens—quicker ambulances, instant deliveries, new industries—the system won’t hesitate to claim credit. But for every pothole or jam, the blame sits on the shoulders of the everyday person.

Two chains, locked in place:

  • One holds us accountable.
  • The other ensures that when there’s glory (or profit), the system claims it first.

Breaking free means calling out these chains for what they are—deeply embedded habits that protect the powerful and burden the rest. Until we name them and demand better, the blame and the credit will keep flowing in all the wrong directions.

No Analytics. No Trackers. No Counters. Just Writing.

Most websites today are obsessed with knowing everything about their visitors. How many people came? Where did they come from? How long did they stay? What did they click on? Analytics tools promise insights, growth, and optimization. But what if you just… didn’t track anything?

What Happens When You Remove Analytics?

At first, it feels unsettling. There’s a sense of control in knowing your numbers, and letting go of that can feel like flying blind. But then, something shifts. Your blog becomes a place, not a machine. A space for words to exist without constantly being measured.

The Benefits

1. Pure Privacy – Readers get a clean, private experience. No cookies, no scripts, no surveillance.

2. Speed – Your site loads faster. No analytics means no extra requests slowing it down.

3. Less Mental Noise – You stop obsessing over traffic spikes and dips. The pressure to optimize fades.

4. No Compliance Headaches – No need to worry about GDPR, CCPA, cookie banners, or privacy policies.

The Trade-offs

1. You Don’t Know Who’s Reading – No pageviews, no location data, no engagement metrics. Just silence.

2. No Feedback Loops – If a post resonates, you’ll only know if someone tells you directly.

3. No Error Tracking – You might not notice broken links or pages unless a reader reports them.

So, Why Do It?

Because not everything needs to be measured. Not every blog needs to be a content funnel, a conversion machine, or a data-driven growth experiment. Some writing is just… writing.

A Middle Path

If you still want a sense of what’s happening without tracking users, here are some alternatives:

• Server Logs – Your hosting provider likely keeps raw access logs, which give basic visit data without invasive tracking.

• Privacy-first Analytics – Tools like Plausible or Fathom offer lightweight, cookieless analytics. This blog might end up using one of them.

• Direct Engagement – Encourage emails, comments, and discussions instead of tracking passive views.

Bottomline

Do you write to be read, or do you write to be measured? If it’s the former, maybe you don’t need analytics at all. Let the words stand on their own. If they matter, people will find them. And if they don’t, no amount of tracking will change that.

The Death of the Model & The Rise of Influence

Beauty, Authority, and the Algorithm

Once, beauty had a singular form. A face, a figure, a distant gaze from a billboard. Models weren’t people; they were placeholders for a brand’s fantasy. Now, those placeholders have been replaced—not by better models, but by people who can do more than just look good.

That’s The Death of the Model—a shift where aesthetics alone no longer sell. Influence does.

It’s why fashion weeks now feel like influencer meetups. Why luxury brands no longer bet on a singular face but on dozens of micro-creators who bring in their own niche audiences. Why fitness models, once silent bodies in print ads, are now trainers with YouTube channels.

But as models fade, a new dynamic takes over: The Authority Shift.

From Casting Directors to Algorithms

Before, brands chose their models. Now, algorithms do. The old system was built on selection—casting calls, portfolio reviews, fashion houses deciding who “deserved” visibility.

Now? Your engagement rate decides. Your ability to hold an audience, your knack for storytelling, your relatability. Brands don’t need gatekeepers anymore. They need numbers, and they need people who can convert.

That’s why campaigns aren’t shot in pristine studios anymore but in bedrooms, cafes, and home gyms. The influencer isn’t a blank canvas; they’re the main character. The product is just a supporting actor.

Industries Have Fallen in Line

It’s not just fashion. Influence has rewritten entire industries:

  • Food & Beverage – The best marketing isn’t a Michelin-starred chef in an ad; it’s a home cook going viral on Instagram.
  • Tech & Gadgets – Apple still uses Hollywood faces, but when it’s time to buy, consumers check MKBHD’s YouTube review.
  • Travel & Hospitality – No one trusts glossy brochures. We trust travel vloggers showing us hidden spots on TikTok.
  • Finance & Investing – No one reads bank brochures, but everyone watches that one influencer explaining tax-saving hacks.
  • Luxury & Auto – Even Rolex, even Porsche, even Dior—brands that once thrived on exclusivity—are now collaborating with influencers who make their products aspirational yet “accessible.”

Where This Is Headed

Models were just the beginning. The idea of an “influencer” as a niche category is outdated. Influence is the new qualification—whether you’re selling clothes, software, or ideas.

The next shift? Influence will be so embedded into campaigns that we won’t even see it anymore. AI influencers, hyper-personalized ads, products seamlessly woven into content without feeling like marketing at all.

Models were about perfection. Influence is about trust.

The billboard era is over. The feed has taken over.

Have delusions that are helpful, stave off despair

We all have delusions. Some are crippling—like the belief that nothing will ever get better. Others are helpful—like the conviction that if we just keep going, something will click.

The trick is to choose the ones that serve us.

The artist believes, against all odds, that the next brushstroke will make the painting come alive. The entrepreneur believes that the hundredth rejection is just the last step before success. The person crawling out of grief convinces themselves that tomorrow might hurt a little less.

None of these are facts. They are stories we tell ourselves, and they shape our reality. A useful delusion can carry us through the parts of life where despair lurks, waiting for us to give up.

In sterquiinius invenitur—In filth, it will be found.

Jordan Peterson brought up this old alchemical phrase in a conversation with Theo Von, tying it to Carl Jung and the legend of King Arthur.

The knights of the Round Table set off in search of the Holy Grail—the ultimate value, the thing that redeems existence. But they didn’t know where to look. So, each knight faced the dark forest and entered at the point that seemed darkest to him. The place they least wanted to go.

That’s the rule. The answers you seek are buried in the places you avoid. The thing you need most is wrapped in discomfort, failure, and fear. That’s the way of transformation—not through the clean and easy, but through the mess.

Alchemy wasn’t just about turning lead into gold. It was a metaphor: that the muck, the rejected, the discarded, is where the treasure lies. And that applies to us.

Despair tells you to stop. A helpful delusion whispers, “Just a little further.”

If you must believe in something, let it be something that moves you forward.

Social Media Series [Part 4] : The Algorithm Knows You Better Than Your Friends

You don’t pick your thoughts anymore.

You think you do. But open your phone, and the algorithm’s already decided what’s on your mind today.

That trending topic? That viral controversy? That product you suddenly want?

Not random. Not coincidence. Just data doing its job.

It’s subtle. It’s invisible. And that’s why it works so well.

Once, your worldview was shaped by the people around you—family, friends, mentors. Now, it’s shaped by an AI that feeds you more of whatever keeps you scrolling.

You’re not just a user. You’re a profile in a system. A constantly refined model, optimized for engagement.

It learns what makes you tick.
It learns what makes you mad.
It learns how to keep you here just a little longer.

The more you use it, the more you train it.
The more it trains you, the more predictable you become.

People used to say, “You become the average of the five people you spend the most time with.”

But what if you spend the most time with an algorithm?

What happens when it knows you better than your best friend?
What happens when it reinforces every bias, feeds every insecurity, fuels every addiction?

You’re not being shown what’s true.
You’re being shown what works.

And what works—for them—is whatever keeps you watching.


So what now?

You could fight it. But let’s be real—you won’t. Neither will I.

It’s too good at what it does.
It’s too convenient. Too fun. Too seamless.

The best you can do? Be aware.

Because once you know you’re being shaped, you can start choosing who you become.

Europe’s Net Loss: The Illusion of Wealth and the Reality of Extraction

For centuries, Europe extracted wealth, resources, and human capital from the rest of the world, fueling its industrial revolution and empire-building. Yet, when we look at Europe today, a striking paradox emerges: the very nations that once pillaged the globe now struggle to maintain relevance in an increasingly multipolar world.

Take Britain, for instance. A nation that colonized and drained vast territories, most notably India, now finds itself in economic decline. Economist Utsa Patnaik estimated that Britain owes India $45 trillion in reparations for its colonial loot. To put that in perspective, Britain’s entire GDP today is barely $3.3 trillion. If it were to repay what it stole, it would cease to exist as an economic entity.

This reveals an uncomfortable truth—Britain (and much of Europe) was never truly “rich.” It was merely propped up by theft, and without its empire, its actual productive capacity was weak. The empire was its lifeline. When the empire crumbled, so did Britain’s status.

The Myth of European Innovation

There’s a persistent myth that Europe’s wealth came from its own ingenuity. But history tells us otherwise. The industrial revolution was fueled by stolen cotton from India, enslaved labor in the Americas, and free-flowing capital extracted from colonies. London and Paris thrived because the world paid the price. When that supply chain of exploitation was cut off, these economies began to stagnate.

Compare this to Asia. China and India were once among the world’s richest economies before colonization. Now, freed from European plunder, they are rising again, not through conquest but through productivity. Meanwhile, Europe, which had centuries of stolen advantage, now clings to relevance with outdated institutions like the EU, internal economic crises, and declining global influence.

The True Cost of Colonization

Colonization wasn’t just about looting wealth—it also destroyed economic structures in the colonized nations, making them dependent and delaying their natural growth. India, for example, had a 25% share of global GDP before British rule. By the time the British left, it was reduced to less than 3%.

But what did Britain do with this stolen wealth? It squandered it. Instead of building a sustainable economy, it created a rentier system—living off past gains without producing new ones. Today, its industries are weak, its politics is fractured, and its economy is floundering.

Europe’s Future: A Declining Power

As Asia, Africa, and Latin America reclaim their agency, Europe faces a harsh reality—it is no longer the center of the world. It doesn’t have the colonies to sustain its illusion of wealth anymore. It lacks the productive power to compete with rising economies.

The European model—built on extraction rather than creation—has run its course. Without the ability to loot, Europe has little left to offer. The debt it owes the world is greater than the wealth it possesses. And that is why, in a truly global accounting, Europe is a net loss.

Scroll to Top