News Channels, Social Media and Fog of War
The “Fog of War” used to be a metaphor.
A way to describe the chaos.
The confusion on the battlefield.
The uncertainty in strategy.
And the blindness of those who command.
But today, the fog isn’t just a consequence of conflict.
It’s a tool.
A weapon.
And worse, a product.
In the age of screens and scrolls, war isn’t just fought with guns and jets.
It’s fought with hashtags, graphics, shouting anchors, and dopamine-pumped montages.
When there is a skirmish on the ground, there’s a storm in the feed.
One side claims it shot down two enemy jets — but there’s no wreckage, no footage, no clarity.
The other says it destroyed a strategic port — only for locals to go live from the docks, waving at the camera, ships quietly anchored behind them.
A “massive retaliatory strike” trends at 8:05 PM — while satellite images show nothing new.
And far from the frontlines, people rub their hands with glee.
Hundreds, even thousands of kilometers away — in drawing rooms, offices, and WhatsApp groups — there’s a sense of excitement.
They’re not in danger.
They’re not in doubt.
They’re watching a show.
They forward unverified clips.
They yell over dinner.
They tweet like it’s a sport.
“Teach them a lesson,” they say — and refresh for the next episode.
Because today, war is content.
And the audience is hungry.
The Newsroom Becomes the Battlefield
The fog used to rise from the battlefield.
Now it’s piped directly into our homes.
Newsrooms blare fake war sirens, not once but through entire segments.
Anchors, red-faced and breathless, shout over simulated explosions and ticker tapes screaming BREAKING.
Glowing maps. Countdown clocks. Flashy graphics. Manufactured adrenaline.
Peace activists are shouted down.
Experts asking for de-escalation are mocked or cut off mid-sentence.
A guest suggesting diplomacy is labeled “anti-national” before they finish their point.
Disagreement was once a sign of democracy.
Now, it’s treated as betrayal.
The louder the anchor, the higher the ratings.
The more unhinged the rhetoric, the more viral the clip.
And the people watching?
They begin to mimic the tone.
Their feeds grow hostile.
Their opinions harden into slogans.
The shouting isn’t just on the screen anymore.
It’s inside us.
We once talked about the Accountability Chain — the fragile but essential link between truth, governance, and public trust.
But in today’s hyper-manufactured climate, that chain isn’t just broken — it’s being actively dismantled.
- Governments spin selective truths.
- Media packages it into palatable theatre.
- Citizens consume and repeat — louder, harsher, more blindly.
Truth is no longer a civic responsibility.
It’s a narrative tool.
A tradable coin in the marketplace of public sentiment.
And in all this noise, no one is asking the obvious:
What security failure allowed this to happen in the first place?
Who missed the warnings?
Where was the breach in intelligence, protocol, diplomacy?
Accountability isn’t just about what happens after a conflict.
It’s about what failed before it even began.
But the moment the sirens go off in the studio, the questions vanish.
The chants begin.
And the performance takes over.
The New Face of War: Noise, Not Clarity
Today, every ethical line is crossed with a confident excuse:
“This is information warfare.”
They say:
“We must win the perception battle.”
“We’re fighting on all fronts — physical and digital.”
“Lies must be met with stronger lies.”
But when everyone lies, who’s left to believe?
When every voice shouts, who hears the truth?
And when war itself becomes performance — who are we?
Just spectators.
Clapping for explosions that never happened.
Cheering for victories we don’t understand.
Performing rage for people we’ll never meet.
Because today, war isn’t about territory.
It’s about mindshare.
And the fog?
It doesn’t just hide the truth anymore.
It replaces it.